Saturday, October 11, 2025

Wide Sargasso Sea

Hello everyone,

This blog is responding to a thinking activity task assigned by Prakruti ma’am. Which is based on Postcolonial Text Jean Rhy’s Wide Sargasso Sea. It is a postcolonial feminist novel that gives voice to the silenced Creole woman from Jane Eyre, exploring themes of identity, race, gender, and colonial power in the Caribbean.


#About Novel: ‘Wide Sargasso Sea’


Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) by Jean Rhys is a prequel to Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. It tells the untold story of Bertha Mason, the “madwoman in the attic,” and gives her a real name — Antoinette Cosway.


The novel is set in Jamaica and Dominica after the end of slavery. Antoinette is a white Creole woman who grows up between two worlds — not accepted by the Black Jamaicans or the white Europeans. She marries an unnamed Englishman (Rochester), who cannot understand her culture or emotions. He begins to distrust her, renames her “Bertha,” and takes her to England, where she slowly loses her identity and sanity.

Rhys uses this story to show colonial tension, racial conflict, and female oppression. The rich Caribbean setting — full of beauty, colour, and danger — reflects Antoinette’s emotional turmoil.


In the end, trapped in an English attic, Antoinette dreams of fire and freedom — a symbol of both madness and resistance.


#About Author: Jean Rhys



Jean Rhys (1890–1979) was a Dominican-born British writer known for her deep, emotional portrayals of loneliness, displacement, and identity. Born in the Caribbean island of Dominica to a Welsh father and a Creole mother, Rhys grew up between two cultures — colonial and native, which shaped her writing. Her early novels, such as Voyage in the Dark and Good Morning, Midnight, explore the struggles of women who feel lost and isolated in a male-dominated and colonial world. Her most famous work, Wide Sargasso Sea (1966), reimagines the life of Bertha Mason from Jane Eyre, giving voice to a silenced Creole woman. Rhys’s writing style is lyrical, honest, and modern, revealing the pain of exile and the search for identity. Today, she is celebrated as a major postcolonial and feminist author whose works bridge Europe and the Caribbean.





Here, Answers of questions assigned in a thinking activity task.


Q-1: Write a brief note on Caribbean cultural representation in “Wide Sargasso Sea”.


“There is always the other side, always.” – Jean Rhys, Wide Sargasso Sea


1.1 Introduction

1.2 The Caribbean Landscape and Atmosphere

1.3 Cultural Mixing and Creole Identity

1.4 Post-Emancipation Society and Racial Tension

1.5 Beliefs, Superstition, and Local Wisdom

1.6 Language and Cultural Voice

1.7 Colonialism and Cultural Erasure

1.8 Conclusion

1.1 Introduction

This line from Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea expresses the heart of the novel — the idea that there is another side to every story. Published in 1966, the novel gives voice to the Caribbean “other side” of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Rhys, who was born in Dominica, represents the Caribbean world with its unique culture, race relations, and postcolonial identity. Through her descriptions, characters, and themes, Rhys captures the beauty and conflict of the islands during the period after slavery.

1.2 The Caribbean Landscape and Atmosphere

The Caribbean setting is central to the novel. Rhys’s vivid descriptions of nature — the “green, wet hills,” “heavy scents,” and “coloured flowers” — create a strong sense of place. The landscape is lush, mysterious, and sometimes threatening. It reflects both the physical beauty and the emotional intensity of the Caribbean world. The tropical environment becomes a living part of the story, showing how deeply culture and nature are connected in island life.

1.3 Cultural Mixing and Creole Identity

Caribbean culture in the novel is shown as mixed and hybrid. Antoinette, the white Creole heroine, stands between two cultures — she is not fully European or African. This in-between identity mirrors the multicultural society of the West Indies. The novel includes elements of Creole language, local customs, and songs, which give authenticity to the Caribbean setting. Rhys presents Creole identity as rich but also fragile, always struggling for acceptance and belonging.

1.4 Post-Emancipation Society and Racial Tension

The novel takes place after the abolition of slavery, a time of great change in the Caribbean. The newly freed Black community resents the white plantation owners who once ruled them. Antoinette’s family, the Cosways, face hatred and isolation, and their estate is burned down. This event shows how colonial history continues to divide people by race and class. Rhys uses this social background to reveal the deep wounds left by slavery and colonialism.

1.5 Beliefs, Superstition, and Local Wisdom

Through the character of Christophine, Rhys represents the strength of Afro-Caribbean tradition. Christophine practices obeah (spiritual healing and magic), which frightens the English characters but also empowers her. This spiritual belief system reflects the Caribbean people’s connection to their African roots and their resistance to European domination. Christophine’s voice, strong and fearless, represents the wisdom and power of native Caribbean culture.

1.6 Language and Cultural Voice

Rhys’s language blends English with Creole rhythms, giving voice to local expression. The difference between Rochester’s formal English and Antoinette’s Creole-influenced speech shows a clash of cultures — colonizer versus colonized, Europe versus the Caribbean. By letting Caribbean voices speak in their own tone, Rhys celebrates the cultural richness of the islands.


“I will write my name in fire, red fire.”- This line symbolizes Antoinette’s final act of reclaiming her identity, a metaphor for the Caribbean spirit burning brightly against colonial silence.


1.7 Colonialism and Cultural Erasure

The Englishman (Rochester) in the novel symbolizes colonial authority. When he renames Antoinette as “Bertha,” he takes away her identity and cultural roots. This act of renaming represents how colonial powers tried to silence Caribbean identity. Rhys’s rewriting of this story is an act of postcolonial resistance — giving back voice and dignity to the people and cultures erased by the empire.

1.8 Conclusion

In Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys beautifully captures the spirit of the Caribbean — its natural beauty, cultural mixing, spiritual traditions, and painful colonial history. She presents the islands as a place of both freedom and suffering, where identity is shaped by race, language, and power. Through Antoinette and Christophine, Rhys brings to life the voices of Creole women and the struggles of Caribbean society. The novel stands as a powerful representation of Caribbean culture, turning the forgotten background of Jane Eyre into a story of identity, resistance, and belonging.



Q-2: Describe the madness of Antoinette and Annette, give a comparative analysis of implied insanity in both characters.

“There is no looking-glass here and I don’t know what I am like now.” – Antoinette, Wide Sargasso Sea

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Annette’s Madness

2.3 Antoinette’s Madness

2.4 Comparative Analysis

2.5 Conclusion

2.1 Introduction

In Wide Sargasso Sea (1966), Jean Rhys explores madness as both a personal tragedy and a social construction. The two central female figures, Annette (the mother) and Antoinette (the daughter), are both described as “mad” by the society around them. However, their madness is not natural; it is a result of colonial oppression, racial tension, gender inequality, and emotional isolation. Rhys uses both women to show how patriarchy and colonialism destroy the minds and identities of Creole women in the Caribbean.


2.2 Annette’s Madness

Annette, a beautiful white Creole woman from Martinique, becomes mentally unstable due to social rejection and trauma. After emancipation, her family loses wealth and social status. The Black community despises her because she is white, while the English colonizers consider her inferior because she is Creole.

When her estate, Coulibri, is burned down and her son Pierre dies, Annette experiences a psychological breakdown. She screams, bites, and becomes violent — symptoms that others label as “madness.” But Rhys presents her not as insane, but as a victim of isolation and grief. Her “madness” reflects the cruelty of a colonial world that gives no place to a woman like her — neither European nor native, neither powerful nor protected.


2.3 Antoinette’s Madness

Antoinette, Annette’s daughter, inherits both her mother’s sensitivity and her social marginalization. Growing up between two worlds, she suffers from a lack of belonging. Her Creole identity is questioned, and she constantly feels like an outsider.

When she marries the unnamed Englishman (Rochester), he mistrusts her due to rumours of her mother’s insanity and racial impurity. By renaming her “Bertha”, he symbolically erases her identity. Trapped in England, far from her Caribbean home, Antoinette loses her sense of self and descends into madness born of cultural alienation and emotional betrayal.

Her final act — dreaming of setting fire to Thornfield Hall — is not only madness but also an act of resistance. It becomes her only way to reclaim freedom and identity.



2.4 Comparative Analysis: Annette and Antoinette

Aspects AnnetteAntoinette
Cause of madnessSocial rejection, Loss of son, racial isolationEmotional betrayal, identity loss, cultural dislocation
SymbolismRepresents the colonial past destroyed by changeRepresents the colonial legacy broken in England
Response to TraumaWithdraws, becomes violent, trapped in griefRebels dreams of fire, expresses anger through destruction
Relation to MenRejected by husband (Mr. Mason)Betrayed by husband (Rochester)
Types of MadnessMadness of sorrow and lonelinessMadness of alienation and resistance


Both women’s madness is shaped by male domination and colonial control. In both cases, society uses “insanity” to silence women who do not fit its norms. Rhys suggests that what is called madness is often a form of protest against oppression.

2.5 Conclusion

In Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys redefines the idea of madness. For Annette and Antoinette, insanity is not weakness but the final outcome of emotional and cultural exile. Their experiences show how colonial history and patriarchy destroy women’s identities. Annette’s madness is born from grief and loss, while Antoinette’s is born from betrayal and erasure. Both are tragic symbols of the Creole woman’s struggle for voice and selfhood in a divided world.

Through them, Rhys gives madness a new meaning — not as illness, but as a mirror of injustice and silenced suffering.


Q-3: What is the Pluralist Truth phenomenon? How does it help to reflect on the narrative and characterization of the novel?


3.1 Introduction

3.2 Pluralist Truth in Narrative Structure

3.3 Impact of Characterization

3.4 reflection on the Novel

3.5 Conclusion

3.1 Introduction

The Pluralist Truth phenomenon refers to the idea that there is no single objective truth, especially in narratives; instead, truth is multiple, subjective, and shaped by perspective. In literature, this approach allows readers to understand events and characters from different viewpoints, highlighting that reality is experienced differently by each character. In Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea, this phenomenon is central, as the novel uses multiple narrators to explore the complex truths of colonial, racial, and gendered identities.

3.2 Pluralist Truth in Narrative Structure

Wide Sargasso Sea is divided into three parts, alternating between Antoinette’s and Rochester’s perspectives. This shifting narrative creates plural truths:

  • Antoinette’s narrative reflects her emotional world, Caribbean upbringing, and sense of alienation. Her perception of Rochester, her mother, and the environment is shaped by fear, love, and cultural displacement.

  • Rochester’s narrative offers a contrasting perspective, marked by patriarchal and colonial biases. He sees Antoinette as “mad,” exotic, and irrational  emphasizing his misunderstanding of her culture and identity.

This contrast exemplifies the pluralist truth: the same events — like Antoinette’s behavior, Coulibri estate’s destruction, or marital conflict  are experienced differently by each character. Neither version is fully “right” or “wrong”; instead, both are partial realities that together create a richer understanding.

3.3 Impact on Characterization

The pluralist truth allows deep psychological insight:

  1. Antoinette is revealed as a sensitive, tragic figure, struggling with cultural alienation, familial loss, and male domination.

  2. Rochester is shown as a product of European colonial ideology, whose judgments are shaped by fear, misunderstanding, and prejudice.

By presenting these multiple perspectives, Rhys complicates characterization, showing that “madness” or “betrayal” is never absolute; it depends on who tells the story.

3.4 Reflection on the Novel

  • The pluralist truth challenges the single-story narrative seen in Jane Eyre, where Bertha Mason is depicted only as a “madwoman.” Rhys restores Antoinette’s voice, offering the “other side” of the story.

  • It emphasizes the subjectivity of perception in colonial and gendered contexts, making readers question authority, bias, and cultural assumptions.

  • It enriches the novel’s themes of identity, power, and alienation, showing that understanding a character or culture fully requires considering multiple truths.

3.5 Conclusion

In Wide Sargasso Sea, the Pluralist Truth phenomenon is a powerful literary tool. By presenting multiple perspectives, Rhys deepens the narrative, humanizes characters, and critiques colonial and patriarchal systems. It reminds readers that truth is complex and multifaceted, and that the stories of marginalized voices like Antoinette’s, are essential for a full understanding of reality.


Q-4: Evaluate the Wide Sargasso Sea with the perspective of post-colonialism.


“There is always the other side, always.”

This emphasizes Rhys’s postcolonial aim to reveal hidden histories and silenced voices, giving agency to those ignored in colonial narratives.


4.1 Introduction

4.2 Colonial History and Its Effects

4.3 Identity and Cultural Alienation

4.4 Gender, Power and Patriarchy 

4.5 Narrative Technique and Postcolonial voice

4.6 Conclusion


4.1 Introduction

Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) is widely regarded as a postcolonial text because it interrogates the impact of colonialism on identity, race, and power. The novel is a prequel to Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, giving voice to Bertha Mason/Antoinette Cosway, a character silenced in the original story. From a postcolonial perspective, the novel explores the legacy of slavery, racial hierarchies, cultural displacement, and colonial domination, particularly in the Caribbean.

4.2 Colonial History and Its Effects

The novel is set in Jamaica and Dominica after the abolition of slavery. The Cosway family, white Creoles, experiences hostility from the Black community, showing the residual tension from colonial exploitation. The burning of the Coulibri estate and the death of Antoinette’s brother Pierre are direct consequences of this post-slavery racial and social conflict. Rhys highlights how colonialism created fractured societies, where no one fully belongs  colonizer or colonized.

4.3 Identity and Cultural Alienation

Antoinette’s identity is shaped by her Creole heritage, which places her between two worlds. She is neither accepted by the European colonizers nor fully integrated with the Black Caribbean community. Her struggle represents colonial hybridity, a central concept in postcolonial theory. The erasure of her name by Rochester — renaming her “Bertha” — symbolizes the colonial suppression of local identity. The novel demonstrates how colonial power controls, silences, and alienates women and marginalized groups.

4.4 Gender, Power, and Patriarchy

Postcolonialism in Wide Sargasso Sea intersects with feminist concerns. Women like Antoinette and her mother, Annette, are doubly oppressed — by colonial structures and by patriarchal authority. Rochester’s domination over Antoinette exemplifies the imposition of European norms on the Caribbean, reducing her to an object of wealth, exoticism, and control. Madness in the novel is thus socially constructed, a consequence of colonial and patriarchal oppression rather than inherent mental instability.


4.5 Narrative Technique and Postcolonial Voice

Rhys employs multiple narrators and fragmented perspectives, reflecting the Pluralist Truth phenomenon. By giving Antoinette her own voice, Rhys “writes back” to the colonial canon. She challenges the Eurocentric depiction of Bertha in Jane Eyre, restoring agency to a character previously silenced and marginalized. The novel embodies postcolonial literary techniques: reclaiming history, critiquing empire, and centering subaltern perspectives.

4.6 Conclusion

From a postcolonial perspective, Wide Sargasso Sea is a powerful critique of colonialism and its psychological, social, and cultural consequences. The novel exposes the intersections of race, gender, and power in the Caribbean, illustrating how colonialism alienates individuals and distorts identity. Through Antoinette’s voice, Rhys not only revises a canonical text but also challenges the reader to see history and culture from the perspective of the marginalized, making the novel a landmark work in postcolonial literature.


References:

Cappello, Silvia. “Postcolonial Discourse in ‘Wide Sargasso Sea’: Creole Discourse vs. European Discourse, Periphery vs. Center, and Marginalized People vs. White Supremacy.” Journal of Caribbean Literatures, vol. 6, no. 1, 2009, pp. 47–54. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40986298 . Accessed 11 Oct. 2025.



Rhys, Jean. Wide Sargasso Sea (Penguin Modern Classics). Edited by Angela Smith, Penguin, 2000.


Thank You!

Friday, October 10, 2025

The Wretched of the Earth

 Hello everyone,

This blog is responding to a thinking activity task assigned by Megha Ma’am, which is based on the postcolonial text ‘The Wretched of the Earth’ by Frantz Fanon.


#About Non-Fiction work:

‘The Wretched of the Earth’



"The Wretched of the Earth" by Frantz Fanon is a groundbreaking nonfiction work that analyzes the process of decolonization and the psychological and sociopolitical effects of colonialism, focusing especially on Africa and the Algerian War of Independence. Fanon theorizes that colonial rule dehumanizes the colonized through systemic violence, dividing society into colonizer and colonized and enforcing psychological as well as material oppression. He contends that the act of decolonization inevitably involves violence and that liberation occurs only when the formerly colonized actively reclaim both their land and identity.


Fanon’s text is structured around several key essays that explore themes such as colonial violence, the creation of national consciousness, and the development of culture in postcolonial societies. He critiques native elites for replicating colonial hierarchies after independence, and instead elevates the rural masses as the true agents of revolutionary social change. The book’s influence lies in its dual function as a philosophical treatise and a call to action, shaping discourse on postcolonial identity, history, and resistance for generations.



#About Author: Frantz Fanon


Frantz Omar Fanon was a French West Indian psychiatrist, and political philosopher, from the French colony of Martinique. His works have become influential in the fields of post-colonial studies, and critical theory. He critically examined the dehumanizing impact of colonialism on both the colonized and colonizers.


Fanon's works are foundational in postcolonial studies, Black existentialism, and critical race theory.

His ideas have significantly influenced psychology. philosophy, political science, and cultural studies, inspiring liberation movements across Africa, the Caribbean, and beyond. Key thinkers like Edward Said, Homi K. Bhabha, and bell hooks have been drawn from Fanon's theories. His advocacy for revolutionary violence is controversial but central to his theory of decolonization.His other famous works: Black Skin White Mask,A Dying Colonialism


Here are answers of questions assigned by Megha Ma’am regarding work ‘The Wretched of the Earth’.




Q-1: What does Fanon mean when he says “the infrastructure is also a superstructure” in colonialism?

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Marxist Background

1.3 Fanon’s Reinterpretation

1.4  Insights from Gibson’s Article

1.5 Colonialism as Total Structure

1.6 Revolutionary Implication

1.7 Conclusion




1.1 Introduction

Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (1961) is a foundational text in postcolonial theory, examining how colonialism functions as a system of economic, political, and psychological domination. His statement that “in colonial countries the economic substructure is also a superstructure” redefines the classical Marxist model. Fanon argues that under colonialism, economic exploitation and ideological domination are inseparable, forming a single mechanism of control.


I’m mentioning one article related to this statement of fanon which is based on fanon’s work. In that As Nigel C. Gibson explains in his essay “Fanon and Marx Revisited” (2020), Fanon’s “stretching” of Marxism demonstrates that colonial society fuses base and superstructure, where “cause and effect, base and superstructure, change places.”


1.2 Marxist Background 

In Marxist theory, the infrastructure (base) refers to economic structures—relations of production and ownership—while the superstructure comprises cultural, political, and ideological systems that reflect and reinforce the base. In European capitalism, these levels are distinct, though interdependent.

However, Fanon transforms this framework for the colonial world, where the economic and the ideological cannot be separated because colonialism enforces its material domination through racial ideology and spatial segregation.


1.3 Fanon’s Reinterpretation

In The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon observes that colonial society is divided into two worlds: the “colonizer’s sector”—rich, bright, and ordered—and the “native sector”—poor, dark, and chaotic. These are not just social symbols; they are material realities of racial hierarchy. Hence, “the economic substructure is also a superstructure.”


In other words, the colonizer’s wealth and the native’s poverty are both economic facts and ideological statements. Fanon encapsulates this when he writes: “You are rich because you are white; you are white because you are rich.” This means the ideology of white superiority is inseparable from the material infrastructure of colonial exploitation.


1.4 Insights from Gibson’s Article

Nigel C. Gibson, in “Fanon and Marx Revisited,” highlights that Fanon’s insight “stretches Marxism” by showing how race becomes the determining line that merges infrastructure and superstructure. Gibson explains that Fanon reconfigures Marx’s dialectic to fit colonial conditions, where ideology and economics are not layered but dialectically rearranged. Colonial space itself becomes the visible expression of this unity: the geography of wealth mirrors the psychology of domination.


Gibson notes that Fanon’s argument exposes how the colonial system “hides no contradictions beneath the surface”—the violence of economic control is openly visible and racialized.


1.5 Colonialism as Total Structure

For Fanon, colonialism is not merely an economic enterprise but a total structure of oppression—material, psychological, and cultural. The colonized are exploited as laborers and dehumanized as subjects. This double domination blurs Marx’s distinction between base and superstructure, since both serve the same purpose: the maintenance of colonial power.


Thus, the infrastructure (economic order) in colonies directly produces and sustains the superstructure (racist ideology, religion, and administration). The colonial church, school, and military all reinforce the same hierarchical economy.


1.6 Revolutionary Implication

Because the colonial system unites material and ideological domination, Fanon insists that decolonization must destroy both. Liberation cannot come through economic reform alone; it requires dismantling the entire colonial structure—its racial ideologies, political hierarchies, and capitalist dependencies. Gibson supports this view, reading Fanon as a thinker of permanent revolution, who connects Marxist categories to anti-colonial praxis.


1.7 Conclusion

When Fanon asserts that “the infrastructure is also a superstructure,” he exposes the totalizing nature of colonialism, where race, economy, and ideology operate as one. Colonialism fuses material exploitation and psychological subjugation so completely that they become identical aspects of the same system. Gibson’s interpretation clarifies that Fanon “stretches” Marx to reveal how colonial domination embodies both the base and superstructure in one visible, violent order—making decolonization a process of transforming not only economic relations but also consciousness and space itself.





Q 2: Describe how decolonization fits into a larger global capitalist picture


1.1 Introduction

1.2 Decolonization and Global Capitalism (Fanon’s Perspective)

1.3 Manipulation of Nationalism and Neocolonial Pressures (Caute’s Perspective)

1.4 Integration: Decolonization within Global Capitalism

1.5 Conclusion





1.1 Introduction

Decolonization, as a historical and political process, was not merely the transfer of power from colonial rulers to local elites. According to Frantz Fanon in The Wretched of the Earth, it is a radical upheaval that challenges both political domination and the economic structures that sustain global capitalism. Colonialism was built on the exploitation of land, labor, and resources, and the fight for independence directly threatens these global economic hierarchies.


1.2 Decolonization and Global Capitalism (Fanon’s Perspective)

Fanon emphasizes that colonialism is deeply intertwined with capitalism: European powers amassed wealth by extracting resources and exploiting labor in colonies. Decolonization disrupts this system, often violently, because the colonized masses reclaim not only political sovereignty but also economic agency. Fanon argues that true liberation requires restructuring society to break free from inherited economic hierarchies. Mere political independence without economic reform risks perpetuating colonial inequalities under a new guise.


1.3 Manipulation of Nationalism and Neocolonial Pressures (Caute’s Perspective)

David Caute, in “These Dogs Will Do as We Say”, highlights how Western powers attempted to control newly independent African nations by influencing nationalist movements. Even after formal independence, economic dependency persisted through global capitalist pressures, diplomatic interventions, and economic agreements favoring former colonial powers. This shows that decolonization often faced constraints that limited genuine economic autonomy, demonstrating the continuity between colonial exploitation and postcolonial economic subjugation.


1.4 Integration: Decolonization within Global Capitalism

Combining Fanon and Caute’s perspectives, it is clear that decolonization must be understood within a global capitalist framework. Political independence alone cannot guarantee liberation; economic autonomy and social restructuring are essential. The challenge lies in overcoming the lingering influence of former colonial powers and the global capitalist system that benefits from unequal development.


1.5 Conclusion

Decolonization is both a political and economic struggle. Fanon’s analysis underscores the necessity of radical social and economic change, while Caute illustrates the subtler forms of neocolonial influence that shape postcolonial states. Together, they reveal that the fight for independence is inseparable from global capitalist dynamics, and that true freedom requires confronting both political and economic hierarchies inherited from colonialism.


References:

Gibson, N. C. (2020). Fanon and Marx Revisited. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 51(4), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1732570 

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington, Penguin, 2001.

Whittle, M. (2014). “These dogs will do as we say”: African nationalism in the era of decolonization in David Caute’s At Fever Pitch and Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 51(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2014.968289 


Thank You!



Featured Post

Wide Sargasso Sea

Hello everyone, This blog is responding to a thinking activity task assigned by Prakruti ma’am. Which is based on Postcolonial Text Jean Rhy...