Friday, February 27, 2026

Documentation - Preparing a List of Works Cited

 Hello Everyone,

This blog is a response to a thinking activity task of ‘Documentation - Preparing a List of Works Cited’assigned by Prakruti Ma’am based on Research Methodology.


Q:1 Why are Citations needed? Discuss in the context of this chapter.


Citations are essential in academic writing because they ensure clarity, credibility, and academic integrity in research work.


1. To Give Credit to Original Authors
Citations acknowledge the intellectual work of others. When writers borrow ideas, facts, arguments, or words, they must properly credit the original source to avoid plagiarism.


2. To Avoid Plagiarism
Proper documentation protects writers from charges of plagiarism by clearly distinguishing their own ideas from borrowed material.


3. To Enable Verification of Sources
Citations allow readers to trace and verify the sources used in the research. The List of Works Cited provides full publication details so readers can locate the original material.


4. To Strengthen Credibility and Authority
A well-documented paper demonstrates that the writer has conducted thorough research. Using reliable and properly cited sources strengthens the argument and builds academic credibility.


5. To Contribute to Scholarly Conversation
Research writing is part of an ongoing academic discussion. Citations show how the writer’s work connects to, builds upon, or responds to existing scholarship.


6. To Maintain Consistency and Standardization Chapter 5 provides clear MLA guidelines for arranging and formatting entries in the Works Cited list. Standardized citation style ensures uniformity and makes academic work easier to read and understand.


7. To Provide Complete Publication Information
Citations include essential details such as author, title, publication data, and medium of publication, ensuring accuracy and transparency in research.

Conclusion

In Chapter 5, citations are presented not merely as technical requirements but as a fundamental part of responsible scholarship. They uphold honesty, enhance credibility, and allow readers to locate and evaluate the sources that support a research paper.


Q:2 Write a short note on ‘MLA Style’.

MLA Style is a standardized system of documentation developed by the Modern Language Association for writing research papers, especially in the humanities.

MLA Style provides clear guidelines for:

  • Citing sources within the text using parenthetical references.

  • Preparing a List of Works Cited at the end of the paper, arranged alphabetically.

  • Formatting entries with specific rules for author names, titles, publication details, and medium of publication.

  • Maintaining consistency in punctuation, capitalization, and order of information.

The purpose of MLA Style is to ensure clarity, uniformity, and accuracy in academic writing. It helps writers give proper credit to sources, avoid plagiarism, and enable readers to locate the cited materials easily.


Choose a topic of your choice and  create an annotated bibliography containing at least 8 varied qualitative source types pertaining to that topic. [For example, if you choose Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island or a theoretical concept like posthumanism, cite one journal article, one news article, one video, one encyclopedia entry, one book, one book chapter, one webpage, one image pertaining to Gun Island or posthumanism] The annotation must be of 50-100 words.  

Here, I’m choosing the text ‘The Wretched of the Earth’ Theory ‘Decolonization’.

Journal Article: Burke, Edmund. “Frantz Fanon’s ‘The Wretched of the Earth.’” Daedalus, vol. 105, no. 1, 1976, pp. 127–35. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024388 . Accessed 27 Feb. 2026.

This journal article offers a critical evaluation of Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, situating it within the broader intellectual and political debates of decolonization. Burke examines Fanon’s arguments about revolutionary violence, nationalism, and the psychological consequences of colonial rule. The article is particularly valuable for understanding how Fanon’s ideas were received in Western academic circles during the 1970s. Burke also assesses the strengths and limitations of Fanon’s revolutionary humanism. As a peer-reviewed scholarly article published in Daedalus, this source is reliable and useful for analyzing the theoretical framework of anti-colonial resistance and its global implications. It provides historical depth and critical context for studying postcolonial theory and African liberation movements. 

Encyclopedia: Britannica Editors. "decolonization". Encyclopedia Britannica, 1 Apr. 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/decolonization . Accessed 27 February 2026. This encyclopedia entry provides a comprehensive overview of decolonization, tracing its historical development from the late nineteenth century to the post–World War II era. It outlines key events, regions, and political movements involved in dismantling colonial empires across Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean. The article explains causes such as nationalist movements, economic pressures, and global geopolitical shifts. As a reference source, it offers concise definitions and factual grounding rather than theoretical analysis. Its credibility is high due to editorial review and institutional authority. This source is particularly useful for establishing historical background and defining key terms before engaging with theoretical texts such as Fanon or Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. It serves as a foundational reference for understanding the broader context of decolonization.

Book Chapter: Collins, Michael. “Nation, State and Agency: Evolving Historiographies of African Decolonization.” Britain, France and the Decolonization of Africa: Future Imperfect?, edited by Andrew W.M. Smith and Chris Jeppesen, UCL Press, 2017, pp. 17–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1mtz521.6 . Accessed 27 Feb. 2026. 

Collins analyzes how historians have interpreted African decolonization over time, focusing on the shifting roles attributed to African agency, European imperial power, and international dynamics. The chapter critiques earlier Eurocentric narratives and highlights newer historiographies that center African political actors and local resistance movements. It is particularly useful for understanding methodological debates in decolonization studies. As part of an academic edited volume published by UCL Press, the chapter is scholarly and credible. This source strengthens research by providing historiographical depth, allowing readers to see how interpretations of African independence movements have evolved. It is valuable for framing decolonization not only as an event but also as a contested field of academic inquiry.

News Article: Folukeifejola. “The Trouble With Defining Decolonisation: A Table Analogy and Some Reading.” Foluke’s African Skies, 21 Mar. 2025, folukeafrica.com/the-trouble-with-defining-decolonisation-a-table-analogy-and-some-reading . Accessed 27 Feb. 2026. 

This online article explores the conceptual difficulty of defining “decolonisation” through an accessible table analogy. The author argues that decolonization is not simply the removal of colonial rulers but a deeper restructuring of systems, knowledge, and power relations. While not a peer-reviewed academic source, it provides contemporary reflections and accessible explanations that help clarify theoretical debates for broader audiences. The piece is useful for illustrating how decolonization continues to be discussed in digital and activist spaces. It complements academic sources by offering a modern interpretive lens. However, since it is a blog publication, it should be used alongside scholarly materials for academic research.

Book: Thiongʼo, Ngũgĩ Wa. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Boydell and Brewer, 1986.

In this influential book, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o argues that language is central to colonial domination and cultural control. He contends that African writers should reject colonial languages and write in indigenous languages to reclaim cultural identity. The text combines literary criticism, political theory, and autobiographical reflection. It is a foundational work in postcolonial and African literary studies, expanding the idea of decolonization beyond political independence to cultural and linguistic liberation. As a primary theoretical text by a major African intellectual, it is highly authoritative. This source is essential for understanding the cultural dimensions of decolonization and for analyzing literature within anti-colonial frameworks.


Video: Dr. Masood Raja. “Fanon: The Wretched of the Earth | Decolonization.” YouTube, 13 Apr. 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cybCnxehtTQ .

In this lecture video, Dr. Masood Raja provides an accessible explanation of Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, focusing on its key themes such as violence, national consciousness, and the pitfalls of post-independence leadership. The video format makes complex theoretical ideas easier to understand, especially for students encountering Fanon for the first time. While not a peer-reviewed source, it is academically informed and pedagogically useful. It serves as a supplementary interpretive guide rather than primary research material. The lecture supports comprehension of Fanon’s arguments and can aid in classroom discussions and presentations on decolonization theory.


Webpage: United Nations. “Decolonization | United Nations.” United Nations, www.un.org/en/global-issues/decolonization . Accessed 27 Feb. 2026.

This official webpage outlines the United Nations’ role in supporting decolonization and supervising non-self-governing territories. It provides historical background, resolutions, and current initiatives related to the global process of decolonization. The source is authoritative and policy-oriented, offering insight into international legal and institutional frameworks. It is particularly useful for understanding the political and diplomatic dimensions of decolonization beyond theoretical debates. As an official UN publication, it is highly credible and valuable for research focusing on international governance and global policy perspectives.


Image: “Decoloniazation.” Human Rights Career, www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/decolonization-101-meaning-facts-and-examples .

This webpage image and article provide a simplified overview of decolonization, including definitions, examples, and key facts. The visual component helps communicate complex historical processes in an accessible format. While it is not an academic source, it is useful for introductory understanding and visual presentation purposes. The content is best used for contextual or illustrative support rather than scholarly argumentation. When included in research, it should supplement more authoritative academic and institutional sources.


Choose a research article on any one of the following identities: refugees, immigrants, women writers, queer poets, tribal communities. Study the introductory section of that article and identify whether the section adheres to one or more of the 7 principles of inclusive language as discussed by the 9th edition of the MLA Handbook. Justify your observations. 


Here, I’m choosing this article on Tribal Communities.

Barnes, Stuart J., and Jan Mattsson. “Building Tribal Communities in the Collaborative Economy: An Innovation Framework.” Prometheus, vol. 34, no. 2, 2016, pp. 95–113. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2017.1279875 . Accessed 27 Feb. 2026.


The Introduction section of the article largely adheres to the Seven Principles of Inclusive Language discussed in the MLA Handbook (9th ed.). The evaluation is as follows:


First, the section uses bias-free language. It does not contain discriminatory or stereotypical references to gender, race, class, nationality, or any other identity category. Terms such as “individuals,” “organisations,” “consumers,” “participants,” and “entrepreneurs” are neutral and professional.


Second, the text avoids the use of generic masculine pronouns. It does not use “he,” “his,” or “man” to represent all people. Instead, it uses plural and neutral expressions like “participants” and “unknown parties,” which align with MLA’s recommendation to maintain gender neutrality.


Third, the section respects self-identification by not imposing identity labels on any group. Since the article focuses on economic and business models rather than identity categories, there is no problematic naming or misrepresentation.


Fourth, the language does not imply superiority or deficit. No group is portrayed as inferior or less capable. Even when discussing “unknown parties,” the term is used in an economic context and does not carry negative judgment.


Fifth, the article avoids unnecessary labels. It does not mention social, cultural, or demographic categories that are irrelevant to the topic. All terms used are directly related to the research focus.


Sixth, the section uses generally culturally neutral and global language, referring to “societies,” “economies,” and “global scale.” Although one example focuses on Austin, Texas, the language itself does not exclude or marginalize other regions.


Seventh, the writing is precise and avoids generalizations. The claims are supported by citations, and careful phrases such as “one purported alternative” and “a recent study suggests” show responsible academic writing.


In conclusion, the Introduction section strongly adheres to the principles of inclusive language outlined in the MLA Handbook (9th ed.), particularly in maintaining neutrality, avoiding bias, and using gender-inclusive expressions.


Thank You!

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Research and Writing

 Hello everyone,

This blog is responding to a thinking task assigned by Prakruti Ma’am. Which is on Research and Writing.



Post the questions which you prepare for this unit as a part of the reading task on your blog as thinking activity.

Q:1 What is Research Writing? Discuss in detail.


Introduction

Research is done when we want to expand our personal knowledge in order to explore an idea, analyze an issue, solve a problem, or make a point in relation to what other people have written. While personal essays are written, research requires the use of other people’s work aside from our own ideas and experiences. The outcome of research is presented in the research paper, which can be presented in print, electronic, or multimedia form.


1. Research as Inquiry Beyond Personal Knowledge

Research entails looking for information from different sources rather than relying on personal knowledge. It is a process of inquiry that aids us in comprehending a topic in a deeper manner.


2. Types of Research

The research paper is usually a compilation of both primary and secondary research.

2.1 Primary research entails direct research such as the analysis of texts, films, or performances; surveys or interviews; or laboratory experiments. Primary sources include statistical information, historical information, and literary or artistic works.

2.2 Secondary research entails the review of research conducted by other researchers. Examples of secondary sources include articles or books on political topics, historical events, scientific controversies, or literary works.


3. Use of Secondary Research in Academic Writing

Most research papers rely on secondary research. The writing of a research paper requires the discovery, evaluation, and integration of other people’s research, followed by the expression of one’s own thoughts in an effective manner.


4. Research and Original Thinking

The primary aim of conducting research is not only to review the findings of other people but to assimilate and develop them and reach our own understanding of the topic. Research can confirm, contradict, or develop our concepts, but it always assists in developing our thoughts.


5. Research as Exploration and Discovery

Research is defined as an exploration process that results in discoveries that are new, at least to the researcher. Although it involves mechanics like source gathering and documentation, the intellectual task of investigating a significant question is still at the forefront.


6. Research as Communication

A research paper is a type of written communication. It must communicate information and ideas effectively. Documentation should substantiate the writer’s claims but not detract from the writer’s ideas.


Conclusion

In conclusion, research is a systematic and intellectual process of inquiry that transcends personal knowledge. It entails the use of primary and secondary sources, critical assessment of others’ work, and the development of one’s own understanding. Research is both an exploration leading to discovery and a form of effective written communication that presents ideas clearly and responsibly.


Prepare a reverse outline of at least one research paper pertaining to your area of research interest and share it as an infographic on your blog along with the thinking activity. The reverse outline should highlight the following: 1) Hypothesis of the paper 2) Argumentative steps 3) Evidence types 4) Counter-arguments 5) Conclusion strategy


Thank You!







Plagiarism and Academic Integrity

 Hello Everyone,

This blog is a response to a thinking activity task which is assigned by Prakruti Ma’am as part of Research Methodology, on Plagiarism and Academic Integrity.





  1. What is Plagiarism? Write in detail with its consequences, forms

Introduction

Plagiarism is the act of using another person’s words, ideas, facts, images, or creative work without giving proper credit to the original source. It is a form of academic dishonesty because it presents someone else’s work as one’s own. In research and academic writing, originality and honesty are very important; therefore, plagiarism is considered a serious ethical and academic offense.

1. Meaning of Plagiarism

Plagiarism occurs when a writer:

  • Copies exact words from a source without quotation marks and citation.

  • Uses someone else’s ideas without acknowledging the source.

  • Submits another person’s work as their own.

  • Fails to properly document borrowed material.

It is not limited to books and articles; it can also involve copying from websites, classmates, journals, research papers, images, and even digital content.

2. Forms of Plagiarism

Plagiarism can appear in different forms:

a) Direct Plagiarism

Copying word-for-word from a source without quotation marks or citation.

b) Mosaic (Patchwork) Plagiarism

Mixing copied phrases from different sources into one’s own writing without proper acknowledgment.

c) Paraphrasing Plagiarism

Rewriting someone else’s ideas in slightly different words without giving credit.

d) Self-Plagiarism

Submitting one’s previously written work again without permission or acknowledgment.

e) Accidental Plagiarism

Failing to cite sources properly due to carelessness, lack of knowledge, or incorrect referencing style.

3. Causes of Plagiarism

  • Lack of understanding about citation rules

  • Poor time management

  • Pressure to get high marks

  • Lack of research and writing skills

  • Carelessness in note-taking

4. Consequences of Plagiarism

Plagiarism has serious academic and professional consequences:

a) Academic Consequences

  • Loss of marks or failing grades

  • Cancellation of assignment or project

  • Suspension or expulsion from institution

b) Professional Consequences

  • Loss of job or reputation

  • Legal action in serious cases

  • Loss of credibility in academic and research fields

c) Ethical Consequences

  • Damage to personal integrity

  • Loss of trust from teachers and peers

  • Harm to academic community standards

5. How to Avoid Plagiarism

  • Always cite sources properly

  • Use quotation marks for direct quotes

  • Paraphrase correctly and still give credit

  • Maintain proper notes during research

  • Use plagiarism-checking tools if necessary

Conclusion

In conclusion, plagiarism is a serious academic offense that involves using someone else’s work without proper acknowledgment. It can take many forms, such as direct copying, improper paraphrasing, or self-plagiarism. The consequences can be severe, affecting academic performance, professional reputation, and personal integrity. Therefore, students and researchers must practice honesty, proper citation, and responsible writing to maintain academic integrity.


Respond to the following ethical dilemma prompts:

A student rewrites a scholarly paragraph by changing sentence structure and vocabulary but retains the same ideas and sequence of argument. They do not provide a citation because they believe they are “not copying anything.


  1. How should this be treated under MLA guidelines?

This situation would still be treated as plagiarism. Under MLA guidelines. Even though the student has changed the sentence structure and vocabulary, they have retained the same ideas and sequence of argument. According to academic integrity principles, ideas belong to their original author. Simply rewriting the wording does not make the ideas original.

MLA guidelines clearly state that using another person’s ideas without giving proper credit is plagiarism, even if the wording is changed. Therefore, this is not acceptable academic practice.

  1.  Does paraphrasing require citation?

Yes, paraphrasing absolutely requires citation.

Paraphrasing means expressing someone else’s ideas in your own words. However, the ideas still belong to the original author. MLA style requires that you provide:

  • An in-text citation (parenthetical reference)

  • A full entry in the Works Cited list

Citation is necessary whenever you use:

  • Direct quotations

  • Paraphrased ideas

  • Summaries of another author’s argument

  • Specific data, theories, or interpretations

Changing vocabulary does not remove the responsibility to cite.

  1. What would you do in this situation and why?


If I were the student in this situation, I would immediately add a proper in-text citation and include the full source in the Works Cited page. Even though the paragraph has been rewritten in different words and sentence structure, the ideas and sequence of argument still belong to the original author, and MLA guidelines require acknowledgment of borrowed ideas. I would also review MLA documentation rules to ensure that my paraphrasing is correctly done and properly cited. I would take these steps because academic writing is based on honesty and integrity, and giving credit shows respect for another scholar’s intellectual work. Proper citation also strengthens my writing by demonstrating that my argument is supported by credible research. If I were the instructor, I would treat the situation as plagiarism but also consider whether it resulted from misunderstanding rather than intentional dishonesty. I would use it as a teaching opportunity to clarify that paraphrased ideas, not just direct quotations, require citation under MLA guidelines.

Two classmates study together, exchange notes, and discuss how to approach an essay. Their final essays are not identical in wording but share the same structure, examples, and argument path.

Is this plagiarism, collaboration, or something in between? How should credit or boundaries operate?

When two classmates study together, exchange notes, and discuss ideas, this is generally considered collaboration, which is often encouraged in academic settings. However, if their final essays share the same structure, examples, and argument path—even though the wording is different—the situation moves into a gray area between collaboration and plagiarism. Academic work is expected to reflect each student’s independent thinking and organization. If both essays follow the same outline, use the same supporting examples in the same order, and develop the argument in an identical way, it may suggest that the intellectual work was not independently produced.

Whether this counts as plagiarism depends on the instructor’s guidelines. If collaboration was allowed only at the brainstorming stage, but the drafting and structuring were meant to be individual, then submitting nearly identical frameworks could be considered improper collaboration or even academic misconduct. Plagiarism is not limited to copying words; it can also involve copying another person’s organization or argument without acknowledgment.

Clear boundaries should operate in such situations. Students may discuss general ideas, clarify concepts, and debate interpretations together. However, each student should independently create their thesis, structure, choice of examples, and development of arguments. If significant collaboration influenced the final product, students should consult the instructor to clarify expectations. Transparency is key—when in doubt, asking for guidance prevents ethical issues. Academic integrity requires that while discussion can inspire ideas, the final written work must represent each student’s own original thinking and organization.


A student uses two pages of their essay submitted in last semester’s course and integrates it into a new assignment without citing themselves.

Does MLA treat this as plagiarism? What is this type of plagiarism called? What would an ethical approach look like here?


Yes, under MLA guidelines and general principles of academic integrity, this situation is considered plagiarism. Even though the student is reusing their own work, submitting previously written material without acknowledgement is treated as a form of academic dishonesty because the assignment is expected to represent new, original work produced specifically for that course.

This type of plagiarism is called self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism occurs when a student reuses part or all of a previously submitted paper without permission or without citing it properly. Although the words belong to the student, the work has already been evaluated for credit. Presenting it again as new work misleads the instructor and violates expectations of originality.

An ethical approach in this situation would involve transparency. The student should first check the instructor’s policy regarding reuse of previous work. If reuse is permitted, the student should clearly acknowledge that part of the material was adapted from an earlier assignment and, if required, cite it as an unpublished paper. Ideally, the student should revise, expand, or significantly develop the earlier material rather than simply inserting it unchanged. If permission is not granted, the student should produce entirely new work.

The key principle here is honesty. Academic integrity requires that all submitted work accurately represent when and for whom it was produced. Reusing previous writing without acknowledgment undermines that trust, whereas clear communication and proper citation uphold ethical academic practice.


Thank You!