Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Academic Writing Workshop 2026

 Hello everyone this blog is a part of documentation and my learning experience of Academic Writing Workshop. 


The Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University (MKBU) successfully organized a week-long National Workshop on Academic Writing under the aegis of the Promotion of Higher Education Knowledge Consortium (KCG), Government of Gujarat. Spanning six intellectually intensive days, the workshop brought together university authorities, distinguished scholars, teachers, research scholars, and students in a vibrant academic environment dedicated to strengthening writing skills, research ethics, and responsible AI integration.



Inaugural Ceremony: 27 January, 2026
The workshop commenced with a dignified inaugural ceremony anchored by Ms. Prakruti Bhatt. The programme began with a formal welcome, followed by the University Song and Prayer.


As a symbolic gesture honouring knowledge and scholarship, the dignitaries were welcomed with ceremonial book presentations.


The distinguished guests included:

  • Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor Prof. (Dr.) B. B. Ramanuj

  • In-Charge Registrar Dr. Bhavesh Jani

  • Dean, Faculty of Arts Dr. Kishor Joshi

  • Resource Persons Prof. (Dr.) Paresh Joshi and Dr. Kalyan Chattopadhyay

Prof. (Dr.) Dilip Barad, Head of the Department of English and Workshop Convenor, delivered the welcome address. He outlined the objectives of the workshop, emphasizing a contemporary academic challenge: balancing Natural Intelligence (NI) with Artificial Intelligence (AI). The workshop was structured around academic writing skills, ethical AI usage, NET/JRF guidance, research aptitude, and the development of a Digital Resource Hub.


The inaugural plenary sessions established the intellectual foundation of the workshop. Prof. (Dr.) Paresh Joshi reflected on the evolution of writing across historical phases and stressed the need to preserve human creativity and critical thinking in the age of generative AI. Dr. Kalyan Chattopadhyay traced the tradition of academic writing in India from ancient knowledge systems to frameworks such as NEP 2020 and NCF 2023, emphasizing multilingualism and rooted scholarship.



Day 1 (27 January 2026):

Academic Writing and Prompt Engineering


The first technical session, led by Prof. (Dr.) Paresh Joshi from Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, focused on Academic Writing and Prompt Engineering.



He distinguished clearly between creative writing and academic writing, describing academic writing as the “literature of knowledge” — objective, logical, and evidence-based. He presented writing as a scholarly conversation: one listens through literature review, reports existing ideas, responds analytically, and contributes original insight.

Key principles discussed included:

  • Formal tone

  • Clarity and precision

  • Logical flow

  • Strong thesis statements

  • Responsible claim-making

The second half introduced Prompt Engineering—crafting precise instructions for AI tools. Techniques such as zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and role-based prompting were demonstrated. Importantly, he emphasized ethical AI use, warning against overdependence and encouraging fact-checking and originality.


Day One & Two: (27,28 January,2026):

Advanced Academic Writing

 

Dr. Kalyan Chattopadhyay conducted two intensive sessions on Academic Writing for Advanced Learners. These sessions examined writing as both a formal and rhetorical practice.




Core features of academic writing—formality, objectivity, clarity, and precision—were explored in depth. Participants were trained to:

  • Frame research questions effectively

  • Distinguish findings from interpretation

  • Use disciplined citation practices

  • Apply hedging strategies appropriately

  • Develop coherent literature reviews


Drawing on Ken Hyland’s framework of authorial identity, Dr. Chattopadhyay explained that academic writing is not entirely impersonal; rather, scholars must strategically manage visibility. The nuanced discussion of first-person usage, hedging devices, and rhetorical positioning significantly strengthened participants’ understanding of scholarly voice.





Day Two & Three (28,29 January 2026):

Publishing in Indexed Journals and BAWE Corpus

Dr. Clement Ndoricimpa from Burundi, East Africa conducted online sessions on publishing in Scopus and Web of Science indexed journals.



He explained the importance of indexed journals for visibility, citation impact, and career advancement. The IMRD structure (Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) was elaborated, with particular attention to crafting a strong introduction through the three-move model:

  1. Establishing research territory

  2. Identifying the research gap

  3. Occupying the niche



A recurring emphasis was placed on references and credibility. Unsupported claims were identified as a major weakness in research writing.

The sessions also addressed:

  • Academic vocabulary and coherence

  • Ethical AI usage

  • Plagiarism and integrity

  • Reference management using Mendeley

  • Citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, Vancouver)

These sessions blended technical training with ethical awareness, reinforcing that academic publishing demands intellectual honesty and methodological rigour.


Day Three (29 January, 2026):

Detecting AI Hallucination

Prof. (Dr.) Nigam Dave from Pandit Deendayal Energy University delivered a thought-provoking lecture on AI Hallucination and Academic Integrity.



He defined AI hallucination as the production of statistically plausible but factually fabricated information. Scholars were warned against blindly trusting AI-generated citations, vague phrases, or invented references.


He highlighted warning signs such as:

  • Unverified claims (“studies show…”)

  • Fabricated citations

  • Confident but unverifiable prose

Importantly, he did not reject AI outright. Instead, he advocated for ethical and strategic use—AI as assistant, not author. Human oversight, critical verification, and scholarly judgment were presented as non-negotiable responsibilities.


Day Four & Five (30,31 January, 2026):

From Classroom to Academic Career

 

Dr. Kalyani Vallath conducted transformative sessions integrating academic writing, NET preparation, literary history, and career orientation.



She emphasized growth mindset, disciplined practice, and strategic planning. Writing was described as a skill cultivated through revision and reflection. Practical techniques such as free writing, reverse planning, and mind mapping were introduced.


Her sessions on UGC NET preparation demystified the exam, showing that it tests reasoning and conceptual clarity rather than rote memory. Literary history and theory—from classical criticism to Structuralism, Feminism, and Postcolonialism—were presented in an integrated conceptual framework.

The sessions extended beyond examination strategies to long-term academic identity building and self-belief.


Day Six (01 February,2026):

Multimodal E-Content and Digital Resource Hub

The concluding session by Prof. (Dr.) Dilip Barad focused on Multimodal E-Content Creation aligned with NEP 2020.



Distinguishing between pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy, he emphasized learner autonomy and discovery-based education. AI tools such as NotebookLM were demonstrated for creating structured, source-grounded digital content.


A key innovation was the introduction of a “Fifth Quadrant” to the SWAYAM model—integrating AI-based activities that promote critical thinking rather than passive consumption.


The session reinforced a central theme of the workshop: technology must serve pedagogy, not replace it.


This week-long workshop was more than a training programme—it was an intellectual journey bridging tradition and technology, scholarship and innovation, discipline and creativity.


Heartfelt gratitude is extended to:

  • Prof. (Dr.) Dilip Barad, Convenor and Head of Department

  • Co-convenors Ms. Megha Trivedi and Ms. Prakruti Bhatt

  • The Promotion of Higher Education Knowledge Consortium (KCG), Government of Gujarat

  • The dedicated students and volunteers

Their collective effort ensured the workshop’s smooth execution and lasting academic impact.


Conclusion

The National Workshop on Academic Writing at MKBU reaffirmed that academic writing is not merely a technical skill but an ethical, intellectual, and reflective practice. In an era shaped by Artificial Intelligence, the workshop emphasized that human judgment, originality, and integrity remain at the heart of scholarship.

The six days left participants not only better writers, but more responsible scholars—equipped to contribute meaningfully to the evolving landscape of higher education.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

Academic Writing Workshop 2026

  Hello everyone this blog is a part of documentation and my learning experience of Academic Writing Workshop.  The Department of English, M...